In addition to naturalistic decision making, which decision-making model do fire ground commanders use?

The recognition-primed decision-making model is particularly relevant for fire ground commanders as it reflects how decisions are made in dynamic and high-pressure environments, like emergency situations. This model emphasizes that experienced individuals can quickly assess a situation by recognizing patterns and retrieving relevant experiences from their memory, allowing for rapid and effective decision-making.

In the context of firefighting, commanders often face scenarios where time is critical, and information may be incomplete. The recognition-primed decision-making model allows them to draw on their training and past experiences to identify viable courses of action without needing to evaluate every possible alternative in detail. This leads to faster and more intuitive responses, which are essential for achieving effective outcomes during emergencies.

Other decision-making models, such as statistical analysis or collaborative decision-making, may have their places in different contexts but do not capture the instinctive and rapid decision-making process that seasoned fire ground commanders rely on when responding to incidents. Likewise, directive decision-making may be more authoritative and less responsive to the fast-paced and unpredictable nature of fire scenarios, making recognition-primed decision-making the most suitable choice in this setting.